Bailey and Sophia. multi-fandom blog

On this blog:
Doctor Who
Harry Potter
Supernatural
Sherlock
Once Upon A Time
Tim Burton
Hunger Games
Random
13/10/14

No matter where you run, you just end up running into yourself.

Breakfast at Tiffany’s (1961)

13/10/14

weeping-who-girl:

David filming Billie David Tennant’s Video Diaries

13/10/14

that’s what i am, just a traveler. imagine it, no tax, no bills, no boss. just the open sky

that’s what i am, just a traveler. imagine it, no tax, no bills, no boss. just the open sky

11/10/14
school: your tuition bill is-
me: oh darling, stars never pay
08/10/14

Actual 90s babe, Brad Pitt

Actual 90s babe, Brad Pitt

08/10/14

What we have is a great love. It’s complicated. Intense. All-consuming.

07/10/14
05/10/14

smartgirlsattheparty:

zimbolt:

KILLED IT

Mic Drop. 

03/10/14
assbutt-in-the-garrison:

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.
The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.
Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 
"We don’t need feminism" 
"Maybe he just worked harder"
"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

signal boost the shit out of this cuz I’m sick and tired of arguing with MRAs and anti-feminists about how the supposed studies they say disprove the existence of the pay gap are not credible but they never listen.

assbutt-in-the-garrison:

hi-coup:

cloudcuckoolander527:

yayfeminism:

One would assume that scientists, who are trained to think objectively, are completely immune to gender discrimination. However, a recent Yale study by Corinne Moss-Racusin and colleagues suggests otherwise.

The researchers created a fictional student and sent out the student’s application to science professors at top, research-intensive universities in the United States. The professors were asked to evaluate how competent this student was, how likely they would be to hire the student, how much they would pay this student, and how willing they would be to mentor the student. All of the applications sent out were identical, except for the fact that half were for a male applicant, John, and half were for a female applicant, Jennifer. Results showed that, with statistical significance, both male and female faculty at these institutions were biased towards male students over female students.

Data from the study shows that on average, science faculty was willing to pay the male applicant about $4,000 more per year. 
source

"The gender gap doesn’t exist" 

"We don’t need feminism" 

"Maybe he just worked harder"

"*any MRA bullshit*"

I had to read this study for class. It is thorough as fuck.

signal boost the shit out of this cuz I’m sick and tired of arguing with MRAs and anti-feminists about how the supposed studies they say disprove the existence of the pay gap are not credible but they never listen.